[Sidefx-houdini-list] Camera model

Colin Doncaster colin.doncaster at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 11:06:04 EST 2012


Out of curiosity - what would you assume to be good defaults for f-stop and iso as, in the case of exposure, the amount of light hitting the sensor/film would vary depending on the lens?

On 2012-11-28, at 5:17 AM, Jordi Bares Dominguez <jordibares at gmail.com> wrote:

> The moment you enter into physically base rendering you will end up wanting to use physically correct shaders and that ultimately will take you to realise that is actually not that useful unless you get it all right (physically correct camera and lights too) and also HDR balanced properly (no grading)
> 
> The cascade effect is huge and adapting to the approach is not easy plus takes longer to render each frame but in my experience is more than acceptable for the things you gain.
> 
> Ultimately, like apple did when they designed the iPad, one single rule forced a ton of changes everywhere (no pen, just your finger), with PBR is the same and certain render engines are already there or thereabouts, specially Maxwell, Vray and Mental Ray alongside all the other flavours inspired by these.
> 
> I really hope after this exchange of ideas SideFX see the value and put together a physically correct ecosystem of tools for modern rendering.
> 
> my 2 cents
> jb
> 
> 
> On 28 Nov 2012, at 10:04, Neil Scholes <neil at uvfilms.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Interesting thoughts 
>> 
>> I was thinking that rendering linear light values in high dynamic range is the real benefit  we already have, because after that all real camera limitations such as abberation grain and iso can be faked in a more painterly way in the comp which is surely quicker and easier ?
>> 
>> Also the issues of real world lenses and ISO etc well each camera, lens is going to vary in accuracy even if the camera manufacturers offer a template - rather like f stop vs T stop.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Neil Scholes
>> 
>> +44(0) 7977 456 197
>> www.uvfilms.co.uk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 28 Nov 2012, at 08:50, Jordi Bares wrote:
>> 
>>> I would love that, including the camera transform matrix please. 
>>> 
>>> Jb
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 28 Nov 2012, at 00:32, Colin Doncaster <colin.doncaster at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sure!  I would assume it would be helpful if all of the camera parameters ended up in metadata stored in the output image - this fits well into the EXR camera info as it's meant to represent what exposure the data represents with a good reference point from where to adjust it.  
>>>> 
>>>> This would make a nice COP and/or MPlay addition where you can quickly adjust the values and round robin them back to the scene camera.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> 
>>>> On 2012-11-27, at 6:17 PM, Jordi Bares Dominguez <jordibares at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I don't imagine anyone aspiring to get noise simulation baked in their render and with the ever expanding electronic cameras configurations and codecs this simply may be impossible but it may be useful to get a metric for density of noise in the picture that we can feed into the comp.
>>>>> 
>>>>> hope it makes sense
>>>>> jb
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list




More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list