[Sidefx-houdini-list] inlineCpp vs rock solid tool
hoknamahn at gmail.com
Wed Mar 2 05:22:07 EST 2011
The only one great thing of inlinecpp vital for prototyping is it's
ability to recompile the code without the need to reboot Houdini.
I hope one day SESI will add DSO unloading support.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Olex P <hoknamahn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well... Imagine we don't have a gcc (yes it's reality for some Linux
> distros) or we don't have VS which is even more real for Windows user,
> or version of cpp compiler doesn't match the one we need. This is the
> main reason. Add a breakability of Python SOP / OTLs by user.
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Georg Duemlein <rdg at preset.de> wrote:
>> On 11-03-01 1:24 PM, Olex P wrote:
>>> Probably because a proper HDK SOP will require just 5 minutes more than
>>> inline cpp one but will give a rock solid tool instead :)
>> What's the not so rocksolidness of the inlineCPP then?
>> Georg Duemlein
>> +1 604 726 4230
>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list