[Sidefx-houdini-list] advice on a "set shot" workflow inwindows!??!! (WTF)

Pablo Giménez pablogipi at gmail.com
Tue May 25 05:37:00 EDT 2010

Sorry but I can't believe that there are still people that think in these
Basically were are human beings so we make heman errors and if you can have
a system that minimiae these errors to the minimum you are gaining time for
the "artists".
I can't really understand why people think that a pipeline is against
artist, is against artist that don't care about the rest of the team and the
production and only care about their stuff.
If you work in a pipeline, even in small studios it forces you to adapt you
way of working to it, but also ensures that you can coexists with the rest
of the people in the project, which much more important than being a super
good creative artist.
And to work as a team you need rules, the stricter the rules the better, cos
if something fails is much more easier to track and tackle the problem.
If you relly all the pipeline and production workflow in human
communications capabilities, even in small teams, you are lost in the
mid-long term.
I have a rule of thumg, that so far have worked for me from studios with 3
people to 800. If the studios doen's havea strong pipeline it
guarantees youlong work hours.
Have a good day!

2010/5/24 c.p.brown <cpb at snotbubble.com>

> hmm... It seems like a rather awkward way of coping with artificial
> problems beyond your control.  Like having to work with a labyrinthine
> directiory structure, having to put version numbers in all your
> filenames, dealing with departments or having to log everything with
> an accounting system.  Is this correct?
> If you have the luxury of complete control over your work (which I'll
> concede many do not) then this kind of pedantic systemization is
> showing-off at best, work-avoidance at worst.
> Directory structures can be simple to avoid variables & asset trackers,
> versioning discarded (as backups and time/date stamping come for free),
> departmentalization of files discarded and script dependence kept to a
> minimum.
> If you work simply like this then file management is totally a non-issue,
> sharing work is a matter of communication (as it should be), restored
> work won't be broken and you can concentrate on making pretty pictures
> however you see fit.
> Its also much cheaper and efficient as you can wholly staff your team with
> income-generating artists instead of having to hire support staff, have
> artists devote time to data-entry or having to waste time (and possibly
> talent) on a diciplinary procedure for artists who take shortcuts.
> Exercising your own brains in optimizing work, per shot, is far less
> robotic
> than conforming to a system.
> -cpb
> Subject: Re: [Sidefx-houdini-list] advice on a "set shot" workflow
> inwindows!??!! (WTF)
>   From: Robert Kelly <isstuff at gmail.com>
>   Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 15:20:07 -0700
>     To: sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> what i ended up with is...
> one node called shot master that....
> # sets hip vars for the shot dir, geo dir etc.
> # holds scripts and information to name renders ifd's create
> directories for them as they are needed
> # saves parts of my scene in "shot assets" that are otls that are just
> parts of the scene saved into a hda so it can be loaded and visioned
> independently.
> # manages the saving and loading of the "shot assets" so more than one
> person can share parts of the scene.
> # manages the cloning of the shot assets, so you can be working in
> shot 0450 and need the asset SH_0300_FIRE and the set from shot 0200
> that is saved in the asset SH_0200_SET. this tool will duplicate the
> assets but with the correct naming and types to belong to the shot
> 0450.
> # colouring shot asset nodes to show if they are up to date, the
> system wont force you to update your shot assets so you can go back to
> an old file and it will still render the same. then you could update
> to the latest animation and have the old look on the new animation.
> Inside the shot assets there will be some HDA tool that is used on
> many shots so the smart asset stuff is still being used inside the
> frailly simple shot assets which you can think of as externally saved,
> version able subnets.
> I cooked this up between shots and it has really saved our ass more
> times than we know because we know when we are using the correct
> version of an animation asset or a camera asset. Our renders get saved
> now using information about the shot mixed in with the mantra rops
> name, preventing render naming errors.
> I look forward to adding the features that i think it needs for the
> next version, once this project is over.
> Any time you are behaving like a robot that is probably a good place
> for automation, a script will do it predictably each time you may not.
> Then you can get back to making cool stuff in staid of being a robot.
> Robert.
> _______________________________________________
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list

Un saludo
Best Regards
Pablo Giménez

More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list