[Sidefx-houdini-list] network bgeo generation vs local
sidefx at trinix.ca
Tue Jul 20 12:47:59 EDT 2010
At some point we started using them for that reason but after my benchmark
I realized it took a lot longer to compress compared to copy time it
We end up with a setup making use of local cache as much as possible, i.e.
when the file is not needed by farm. However I still use gz when space is
> as a side tip bgeo.gz will compress the file a bit saving on network
> On 20 July 2010 07:38, Francois Duchesneau <sidefx at trinix.ca> wrote:
>> I've done some benchmarks regarding working local vs network for file
>> generation and I've come with those results.
>> 131 sec. to bake a bgeo file on the network vs 8 sec. locally. To copy
>> local file to the network takes 40 sec.
>> So what I do know is to bake locally and copy to save time. Before I
>> create a pipeline for that I was wondering if others have dealt with
>> and how. Is there an option? Is that issue only on Windows.
>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list