[Sidefx-houdini-list] Linear Workflow
rangi.sutton at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 09:06:01 EDT 2010
On 26 August 2010 20:13, Andy Nicholas <andy at andynicholas.com> wrote:
> Hi Rangi,
> Following the link to Wikipedia, the first line reads:
> "Gamma correction, gamma nonlinearity, gamma encoding, or often simply
> gamma, "
> That's exactly the problem. People often talk about correcting for gamma.
> So does this mean what they're actually saying is that they're correcting
> for gamma correction? I guess that'd be called gamma correction correction
Fair enough. It's all confusing as hell. I'll try and spell it out
As far as I understand it... Your display is constantly darkening
everything. Most images we deal with are sRGB, they have actually got
brighter values.. so when they're displayed, everything turns out equal.
(ie.. a grey value of 0.5 in sRGB, should be displayed as 20% grey. There's
a stack more information in the lower-luma ranges than the higher luma
Of course.. terms like brighten and darken are simplifications.. you know
what I mean.. mid grey goes up == brighten, mid-grey goes down == darken ;)
Type "xgamma -gamma 2.2" to see you monitors in linear space. Your display
is now neutral, with a gamma of 1.0 (assuming it was "normally" calibrated
to begin with!) Everything looks too bright, your interface is washy, it
wasn't designed in linear space.
If you open a jpg now it will look washed out (it's in sRGB space, and your
display is now linear). Open a linear render and it will look true, although
you might need to adapt what you think is true!
Apply a gamma of 0.45 to your jpg with a gamma cop or something, and you've
converted it from sRGB to linear (pretty much). The image is darker now..
So when a monitor is said to have a gamma of 2.2.. it means that 1/2.2 gets
applied to everything. You should "gamma correct" a linear image to your
viewing device by applying a gamma of 2.2 to it.
Take a linear image, apply gamma 2.2, display on a monitor with gamma 2.2..
it will look right.
Take a photograph, your camera inherently applies a gamma of 2.2, display it
on your "normal" monitor (has a gamma of 2.2), it will look right.
Have I contradicted myself? Someone correct me because in Southern
hemisphere we might have upside down denominators... and I usually just
flip shit around until it looks right.
Nuke is a good one for this stuff.. allows you to specify what colour space
images are in on the way in (rather than assume by image type, which I think
cops does).. and allows you to simply control the viewer space. Nuke likes
to work linear internally, as far as I understand it.... which is how stuff
should be composited!
I'm going to hit send then realise I said it all backwards....
More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list