[Sidefx-houdini-list] maya oceans vs houdini oceans

Andrew D Lyons tstexture at gmail.com
Mon Mar 3 16:08:12 EST 2008

I was using it for river chop. I cant send any of the stuff I have,
but it looks pretty nice. Being able to do all sorts of crazy
procedural modelling stuff was the ticket. As always, even if the Maya
tool works OK out of the box, unless you are doing a shot that works
within the range of outcomes it was designed for - things could get
pretty hairy pretty quickly.


On 03/03/2008, Adrian Lee <dryrainstudios at gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks guys prompt as always.
>  Has anyone got any more rendered examples of that they can show of the
>  houdini stuff. The maya one creates good results straight out of the box but
>  is a bit dificult to control where as I imagine the houdini ones have alot
>  more control of wind and wave functions and wont flicker or tesalate as
>  obviously.
>  Has anyone sucsessfully compiled the oceanSop for fedora and H9.1? there
>  were suggestions on the thread but I couldnt see anything concrete.
>  Ed
>  _______________________________________________
>  Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>  Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>  https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list

Andrew D Lyons | Digital Artist | http://www.tstex.com

More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list