[Sidefx-houdini-list] disappearing HDA parameters

Pablo Giménez Pizarro pablogipi at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 12:48:30 EDT 2008


Complitely agree with all the points from Andrew

El 06/06/2008, a las 18:27, Andrew D Lyons escribió:

> Hi,
>
> There are a lot of good revision contols systems out there for *nix,
> and SESI is better off providing hooks for those rather than trying to
> embed one for now (like the system in the video). Here's some more
> ideas for providing some basic support:
>
> - Tighten up hooks for versioning HDAs so people don't have to bake
> version numbers into hda file names to avoid conflicts in a hipfile.
>   - Have hda version readable and writable (with version write/lock
> permissions) from disk. ie expand hotl interface to permit definition
> metadata manipulation.
>   - Have HDA manager in Houdini recognise versions.
>   - Have Galleries recognise and support hda versions.
> - Swap out the filesystem oriented tree in the HDA manager for a more
> production-oriented tree in both hda and gallery. ie.
> job-sequence-shot-task.
>   - Allow hdas to be tagged with job-sequence-shot-task metadata.
>   - Allow galleries to be tagged with job-sequence-shot-task metadata.
>   - A hotl, hom api, and gu interface for "promoting" and "demoting"
> a hda version in the production-oriented tree.
>   - Automatically have the manager give priority to topmost
> production-oriented tree defs when instantiating new ops - even if
> that means ignoring versions.
>   - keep disk location visible and manageable, but shift emphasis to
> the production abstraction.
> - Provide hooks for calling a revision control system on an otl file:
>   - provide a checkout, checkin hook etc.
>   - provide the hda manager a hook to test the lock status of an otl  
> file
> - Multiple instances of the same HDA (name) in a scene hda manager
> causes huge problems. Currently otl file location differences are the
> mechanism that permits this.
>   - disallow multiple hda definitions to be loaded into a hip file
> that have the same version and production tree setting - even if they
> come from different disk directories.
>   - An otl file should only ever contain a single hda. otls that
> store multiple hdas have always created more problems than they solved
> IMHO, and should be flagged with a warning.
> - A new "Digital Asset Set" graph structure with accompanying file
> format. To allow people to manage "sets" of otls.
>   - Sets should work with the production-oriented tree position,
> version values, and disk location.
>   - Set Manager API for HOM
>   - Set manager GUI (in standalone mode as well perhaps?)
>
> That's it for now.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> 2008/6/6 paul simpson <paul at realisestudio.com>:
>> hi robert,
>> thanks for putting this link up.  i think this summarises the  
>> magnitude of
>> the misunderstanding over the last few years.  it seems most people
>> (including sesi?) are getting confused with digital asset  
>> management (ie,
>> textures, external shaders, geometery) and HDA package management  
>> (ie,
>> digital asset dependences).  to me, the former is an open ended  
>> potential
>> quagmire that i would rather sesi leave alone for now.  the latter  
>> is imho
>> an essential tool that we needed (4 years ago) in order to create and
>> package HDA's that in turn use other HDA's within them.  the two  
>> are *very*
>> different subjects!  (you could - in time treat all external files as
>> digital assets - buts that an entirely different topic for now).
>>
>> to reiterate - i see the latter as very important as i would like  
>> to share
>> assets from old jobs, other shops and houdini exchange without  
>> having to
>> worry about which other assets each one is using.  really, we need  
>> all the
>> assets to be included in a search path - and each asset can use  
>> either the
>> latest - or an earlier version all happily and transparently.  i'm  
>> thinking
>> about continuity between jobs here.  i see this as a universal  
>> requirement.
>> i would like this logic to be implemented initially in a bare bones  
>> fashion
>> by sesi - and made open so individual shops can then taylor to  
>> their own
>> needs.  (please look at debian package management for a great  
>> example of
>> what i mean).
>>
>> the video you point us to refers to the former.  so, to answer your  
>> question
>> - i would rather any have the hda dependency system implemented  
>> rather than
>> this tool you refer to.
>>
>> we all need to be clear what we're trying to talk about.  part of  
>> this
>> problem is sesis fault naming HDA's or (OTL's) as "digital  
>> assets".  it's a
>> very generic term within the industry which often refers to texture  
>> maps,
>> geometry files - as in the 3dsmax example you posted.  nomenclature  
>> is very
>> important - and needs to be 'normalised' somewhat - or at least
>> de-obfuscated.  sesi needs to take the bull by the horns and get more
>> production savvy asap.
>>
>> this subject has been talked about at cross purposes for over five  
>> years
>> now!  :-)
>>
>> -paul
>>
>>
>> 2008/6/6 Robert Magee <rmagee at sidefx.com>:
>>
>>> A couple of releases ago, Autodesk put out this movie for their  
>>> asset
>>> tracking in Max8. It starts out as a single window where all the
>>> dependencies in a scene are laid out and their current status is
>>> outlined (links broken, etc..). From this window links can be re-
>>> established and even swapped out for other versions as needed. This
>>> system offers a one-stop-shopping for working with local assets.  
>>> They
>>> can then extend that to a network as a "stage 2" of the system:
>>>
>>> http://download.autodesk.com/media/3dsmax/asset_tracking_max8_380k.mov
>>>
>>> Without going to a full blow asset management system (aka tactic),
>>> would something like this meet the needs outlined in this thread? It
>>> would be very helpful to figure out exactly how far people would  
>>> want
>>> us to go. When we spoke with customers on this in the past, the
>>> requests seemed to lean towards a system that was open and not tied
>>> too tightly with Houdini. A Houdini-centric set of tools might be
>>> easier in the short term to get people started.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6-Jun-08, at 10:21 AM, Ken Ouellette wrote:
>>>
>>>> Paul's problems (I'm assuming here, but based on a hunch of how  
>>>> he has
>>>> worked in the past) is partly on how he is using HDAs. To that
>>>> regard I
>>>> don't think he is out of line asking for a bit more support to make
>>>> the
>>>> packaging and transport/sharing of HDAs easier.
>>>>
>>>> Yes for a small centralized studio it is easier to self manage and
>>>> regulate
>>>> the changes. For a larger pipeline people will naturally build  
>>>> tools
>>>> to
>>>> support some sort of revision system, even it is just a slight  
>>>> twist
>>>> on the
>>>> autoBackup of HDAs and symlinking those to a none versioned  
>>>> reference.
>>>> Opdepend was an helpful addition for getting some help, but the
>>>> process can
>>>> still become complex quickly.
>>>>
>>>> There could be some things that Sesi could do to support
>>>> encapsulated HDA in
>>>> HDAs a bit easier. That has always been a bit of a problem as
>>>> finding what
>>>> is inside one and understanding its dependencies can be a bit of a
>>>> pain.
>>>> Then add to the fact that finding certain disk based references
>>>> (textures,
>>>> geometry, etc) can be a again a bit of a haul to make it work  
>>>> easily.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully some of those basics are easier to handle with python. I
>>>> haven't
>>>> looked, but even if you made up your own methods to handle all the
>>>> cases it
>>>> would take you a while. It all depends on how absolute you want to
>>>> be in
>>>> your version of the asset, not just the HDA. The HDA itself is a
>>>> container
>>>> with parameters, you can inject some of its components (geometry,
>>>> and low
>>>> rez textures) but other items like high rez textures, and rib/ifd
>>>> files
>>>> either don't work in the context (I know Renderman doesn't like it,
>>>> not sure
>>>> about Mantra). So when it comes down to it there are a lot of
>>>> support files
>>>> you need to consider when you are planning out your pipe.
>>>>
>>>> It gets more complex if you start to encapsulate HDAs inside HDAs
>>>> and then
>>>> it can become very important for the order in the loading/
>>>> instantiation and
>>>> then add the dependency issues across these nested HDAs. The
>>>> flexibility in
>>>> Houdini makes it really difficult to contain. Having had a large
>>>> role in
>>>> building two asset management systems for Houdini, it is very
>>>> difficult to
>>>> keep things agnostic and actually requires more structure then you
>>>> would
>>>> expect. There are many ways to create HDAs  and it becomes a job
>>>> just to
>>>> support the different methods. That is part of a natural process of
>>>> having
>>>> and maintaining a pipeline vision and should be expect with every
>>>> system
>>>> though. I do feel it is more of a challenge in Houdini than in  
>>>> other
>>>> products ( <cough>Maya<cough>)
>>>>
>>>> When I saw what Sesi was doing with python and H9 I really stressed
>>>> to them
>>>> that with a hand full of people any studio could quickly flesh  
>>>> out a
>>>> very
>>>> sospicated pipeline if they had some experience in doing it in
>>>> previous
>>>> versions. Having Sesi provide blue print type examples on how to  
>>>> set
>>>> up a
>>>> system would be great but also starts a slippery slope for them.
>>>> Where does
>>>> providing added value stop with support? That is a difficult  
>>>> problem
>>>> for any
>>>> software vendor and one most avoid. I can't blame them
>>>>
>>>> The embedded browser is very helpful to develop an app to handle  
>>>> the
>>>> management of the assets, but there are challenges that inherit to
>>>> using
>>>> that environment. Thankfully Sidefx has made huge efforts to remove
>>>> a lot of
>>>> these but there are still cycles to be spent finding ways to around
>>>> them. In
>>>> the end it is the same problem of Sidefx entering a slippery slope
>>>> of where
>>>> to draw the line for support.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For "a irritated Georg"
>>>>
>>>> Encapsulation for a entire can be easy to implement but has serious
>>>> draw
>>>> backs for updates, both HDA wise and parameters. On the Wild we had
>>>> a fairly
>>>> strict rule that we supported only HDAs, which added its own
>>>> complexity to
>>>> making things (think of how hard it is/was to make a dynamic
>>>> parenting HDA).
>>>>
>>>> We knew what  HDA's whet into a hipfile and what verison they were,
>>>> we also
>>>> saved out all the animation for the files. In some cases we wrote  
>>>> out
>>>> geometry and had special HDAs to handle those cases.
>>>>
>>>> Saving and versioning entire hipfiles and keeping track of the
>>>> versions of
>>>> any HDAs inside....  for a production pipeline is a bit easier and
>>>> can offer
>>>> some benefits, but still has some drawbacks. That method that was
>>>> used as
>>>> well post "the Wild" in a number of shows.  There are always
>>>> challenges
>>>> about updating versions and handling animation.cmd files.....
>>>> keeping track
>>>> of changes between saved hipfiles when it comes to non-HDA elements
>>>> anyone
>>>> can create in Houdini. Connections parenting all that jazz
>>>>
>>>> The real power is to find a method to manage all the information  
>>>> and
>>>> push
>>>> changes out on the fly. Then you complete the circle of the  
>>>> pipeline
>>>> and you
>>>> have the ability to make large sweeping changes effecting renders
>>>> going to
>>>> the farm.
>>>>
>>>> I should stop now.. that is long enough to read :)
>>>>
>>>> -k
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Pablo Giménez Pizarro <
>>> pablogipi at gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> El 06/06/2008, a las 13:33, Peter Robbinson escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It had a lot to do with the asset manager.
>>>>>> There were specialists, Michael being an important one, who  
>>>>>> were the
>>>>>> responsible for developing and maintaining the digital assets.
>>>>>> The artists on the production floor accessed the appropriate  
>>>>>> assets
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> a given scene through the embedded browser. Core used the  
>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>> browser to present an interface to the asset manager. Artists  
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> had
>>>>>> access to the approved assets for an assigned scene. There were  
>>>>>> ways
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> access earlier versions of assets, but only when problems were
>>>>>> encountered. The assest manager allowed artists to report  
>>>>>> problems
>>>>>> (bug
>>>>>> reports) and these were automatically reported to the appropriate
>>>>>> department.
>>>>>> Michael play a big part in getting that system to work, it was  
>>>>>> quite
>>>>>> remarkable. That's not to say it worked well all the time, there
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> plenty of work-arounds necessary and it took time to get working
>>>>>> right,
>>>>>> but it was certainly the best pipeline I had ever encountered.
>>>>>> Keep in
>>>>>> mind Core used version 6 of houdini on that production and  
>>>>>> digital
>>>>>> assets were brand new.
>>>>> Thanks for the explanation Peter.
>>>>> Now I think that you are agree with me that to take the most  
>>>>> from HDA
>>>>> you need some management tool.
>>>>> I am not talking to have this complex system developed at CORE but
>>>>> something simple and easy for the small studios that use tools  
>>>>> that
>>>>> can be used by big houses to develop their own management systems
>>>>> (like the otlversion command for example)
>>>>> In my opinion SESI did really well with the character picker and  
>>>>> pose
>>>>> library tools, something like this, in the browser will be  
>>>>> great. The
>>>>> pose library for example is not the most advanced tool, but it  
>>>>> works
>>>>> out of the box and for a small studio do the job and if you need  
>>>>> to
>>>>> extent it you can.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PeterR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Georg Dümlein wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael Goldfarb <goldfarb at coredp.com> schrieb:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Wild was made almost entirely (like 95%+) without hip  
>>>>>>>> files...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the noobish question , but:
>>>>>>> How does this work?
>>>>>>> Are you using HDA that contain the complete scene?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a irritated Georg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>>>>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini- 
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer"
>>>>>> "everything is coincident"
>>>>>> "Love: the state of suspended anticipation"
>>>>>> "To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
>>>>>> a sensible amount of time, you must lie."
>>>>>> "Easy, is not how you make a living."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>>>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> Un saludo
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>> Pablo Giménez
>>>>> pablogipi at gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Robert Magee
>>> Product Marketing Manager
>>> Side Effects Software Inc.
>>> www.sidefx.com
>>>
>>> 416 504-9876 x327
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> =======================================
> Andrew D Lyons | Digital Artist | http://www.tstex.com
> =======================================
> _______________________________________________
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list



---------
Un saludo
Best Regards
Pablo Giménez
pablogipi at gmail.com







More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list