[Sidefx-houdini-list] disappearing HDA parameters
ben.schrijvers at guerrilla-games.com
Fri Jun 6 05:03:57 EDT 2008
Ah right yes dependancies... that's indeed where the trouble begin's.
I sort of forgot about that.
What about storing the HDA's that the HDA in question depends on.. in
the same OTL.
Yes you get some conflicts when the same HDA is loaded from another OTL,
in particular when it's a different version.
But it's probably simple for SESI to then have the HDA prefer to use the
HDA that's comming from the same OTL.
It's not the best solution as you get multiple simular HDA which are
unsynchronized (they are a copy) in different OTL's.
So I'm in camp 2 myself.
Untill now I've only put multiple HDA's inside a single OTL when the
'main' HDA was depending on them but they where not very useful outside
But 97% of that is now not necessary anymore since the appearance of the
paul simpson wrote:
> 2008/6/4 Michael Goldfarb <goldfarb at coredp.com>:
>> this has come up a few times on od[force]
>> otl management is /extremely/ important...and once you get them under
>> control their power really starts to rock...
>> personally I'd rather see SESI spending time on other things rather than
>> building pipeline tools that only a very few people, mostly those not in
>> a studio environment, will ever use.
>> we built a python based system that versions otls in about 2 man
>> weeks...and even an hscript system could be done in a short amount of
>> someone with some spare time should do something and put it out for the
>> community to help develop...
> if it's so easy then *sesi* should provide a bare bones system! because
> anything is better than the current nothing. whilst the large studios do
> have their own version control system - many small (and surprisingly some
> large) shops have poor (or no) established systems. if sidefx wants to
> expand it's market share and sell houdini to new users (small shops doing
> commercials for instance) then imho it needs to provide a more complete
> package (along with a proper production ready shaders - don't get me started
> on that).
> for what it's worth (and i've mentioned this many many times before) i
> believe that a linux like rpm/deb style dependency system is whats needed.
> the current state of otl management reminds me of pre yast/zypper/yum days
> of linux package management. ie, a complete mess! i believe that proper
> otl management *should* be managed by sesi.
> for example: right now, how could you easily publish an asset (to exchange
> for example) that relies on many other sub assets (say that you have either
> created or downloaded)? you can't - or if you can - please do tell! this
> is hindering us all sharing assets between projects and each other. this is
> a core function that should be provided with the package. (and overridden
> for studio setups).
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list