[Sidefx-houdini-list] Houdini OGL viewports
jordibares at the-mill.com
Tue May 22 11:52:58 EDT 2007
On 22/5/07 13:54, "Peter Robbinson" <probbins at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Are you by chance looking in wireframe? If so, the opengl doesn't use a
> depth que to determine the location of the "wires". In an ortho view
> that should be fine, but in perspective it can be a bit confusing.
> In shaded view though everything should be fine.
That is what I noticed... So it is not possible? This is what I see in XSI
and how I would I see it in HOUDINI.
As you can see the viewport in Houdini is very very distracting because the
grid is OVER the sphere... If this is not a bug/driver issue, my feeling and
suggestion is to change it toward the xsi style.
> Could you fill us in on the general reason why the current project is
> better handled in Houdini and how you determined that. Without of course
> giving anything away.
Building this in Maya/XSI would mean to write a custom plugin that builds
more than 600 objects with hundreds of elements each (a challenge in itself
already) and textures them based on a sequence of footage, making sure we
can change anytime animation, number of objects, number of elements.
Basically a big investment (around 2 months development 1 person) that once
is used has to go to the bin as this is not going to happen again. In 2
weeks we already have it working btw.
> And this list, along with the forum and Odforce are fantastic places to
> get answers. I've never met a more generous and knowledge set of people.
> Ask away.
Thanks, I sure will ask ;-)
> cheers, PeterR
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 11:53 +0100, jordibares wrote:
>> I will have a look at this drivers thing... :-/ thanks so much.
>> Yes, we are pushing this very seriously now after many failed attempts and
>> got a 2nd master license to help in this current project, a project that
>> simply could not be done with Maya or XSI without a big software development
>> investment while in Houdini is "just" lego-work.
>> The thing is that we are going to need a bit of help (at the moment we have
>> a freelancer helping us) but I will take the advantage of this thread to
>> invite all of you that could be interested in helping us in future projects.
>> On 22/5/07 11:13, "Peter Bowmar" <pbowmar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey Jordi,
>>> Nice to hear another London facility is taking the Houdini plunge
>>> :) Sorry, I don't understand your construction plane question... It
>>> looks right to me, in that if the sphere is above the c-plane, then
>>> you see the sphere, if the sphere is below the c-plane then you see
>>> the cplane over top of the sphere. Like XSI maybe?
>>> peter B
>>> On 22/05/07, jordibares <jordibares at the-mill.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all, just a simple question
>>>> As we are jumping in our full fledged production with Houdini a number of
>>>> things I am of course adapting to and others I just feel are not right.
>>>> Is any way the construction plane is painted correctly? I mean, if you get
>>>> an sphere in your scene and you look top-down the bottom of the sphere
>>>> should be painted under the construction plane (opengl painting I mean)
>>>> while the top of the grid should be painted over this construction plane.
>>>> Is any preferences for this behavior?
>>>> Funny enough in Maya the object is always painted OVER the construction
>>>> plane but in XSI it is depending of where those points lay in space (which
>>>> feel is very wise)
>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
>> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
>> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list