[Sidefx-houdini-list] bypass flag in HDAs?

Pablo Giménez pablogipi at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 16:39:42 EDT 2007


2007/8/19, Peter Bowmar <pbowmar at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Darran,
>       Switch is the officially recommended way and other than the
> visual clutter (which you can partially avoid with clever use of
> hiding nodes or subnets) there's no reason not to use it. I'm
> surprised that the opset -b works, that might be a bug since a locked
> HDA shouldn't allow that!


Yes like Peter have recommended before switch is the way to go, otherwise
you have to save your otls unlocked, but this is a mess because then any new
instance is saved as embeebed in the scene and are not refreshed correctly
if you make any change to the original otl.

Cheers,
>
> Peter B
>
> On 19/08/07, Darran Edmundson <darran at edmstudio.com> wrote:
> >
> > How would one expose the ability to toggle a node's bypass flag in an
> > HDA?  You can add a toggle parameter to the type properties with
> > callback script "opset -b $script_value ./<opname>" works ... but this
> > only works while the HDA is editable.  I can use a switch to physically
> > bypass the desired node but this adds a lot of clutter when I want the
> > ability to separately bypass a number of nodes in a chain.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Darran.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Darran Edmundson [darran at edmstudio.com]
> > http://www.edmstudio.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> > Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> > https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list
> Sidefx-houdini-list at sidefx.com
> https://lists.sidefx.com:443/mailman/listinfo/sidefx-houdini-list
>



-- 

Un saludo
Best Regards
Pablo Giménez



More information about the Sidefx-houdini-list mailing list